Record:   Prev Next
作者 Hoffmann, Leif Soren Birger Per Ove Holm
書名 Land of the free, home of the (un)regulated: A look at market-building and liberalization in the EU and the US
國際標準書號 9781124988405
book jacket
說明 387 p
附註 Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-02, Section: B, page: 0833
Adviser: Craig Parsons
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2011
In my dissertation I argue that because the European Union and the United States of America have been largely treated as unique or at least special cases, both the literature on American-state building and that on European market integration have missed how close comparison alters both our descriptive views and social-scientific explanations of the shape of each polity. In particular, scholars have not sufficiently recognized that the European Union has gone further than the United States in many elements of the creation of a centralized, liberalized single market, nor have they produced explanations that account well for this development
This study challenges the dominant assumption that the United States is generally more hierarchical and centralized than the European Union and more of a single free market in the sense of fewer allowable trade barriers. By analyzing the rules of market integration in services (over 70% of GDP), public procurement (15 -- 20% GDP) and the regulated goods markets (goods like elevators with their own regulatory regimes), I demonstrate that in all these major cases the European Union has adopted rules that open exchange to competition more than the United States. While the actual integration of flows on the ground is still generally less across European states than American ones, the political rules are more - and more liberally - integrated in Europe
I offer an institutional and ideational argument to explain these differences, with two main parts. First, there is no American parallel to the institution of the European Commission, which is mandated to continually push liberalization forward. My research shows that Commission leadership has been critical to each of the examined cases. Second, broader norms of legitimate governance favor centralized authority - including liberalizing central authority - more in the European Union than in the United States. Despite all the criticism we hear of the European Union, the basic notion of federal governance of market integration is far more strongly accepted across Europe at both elite and mass levels than in the United States. As interview evidence in this study displays, many Americans consistently object to any role for the federal government
School code: 0171
Host Item Dissertation Abstracts International 73-02B
主題 European Studies
Plate Tectonics
Alt Author University of Oregon. Department of Political Science
Record:   Prev Next