Record:   Prev Next
作者 Conway, Gerard, 1976-
書名 The limits of legal reasoning and the European Court of Justice / Gerard Conway
出版項 New York : Cambridge University Press, 2012
國際標準書號 9781107001398 (hbk.)
1107001390 (hbk.)
book jacket
館藏地 索書號 處理狀態 OPAC 訊息 條碼
 歐美所圖書館  347.24012 C7697 2012    在架上  -  30500101426347
 人文社會聯圖  KJE5461 .C668 2012    在架上    30660020099474
說明 xxvi, 319 p. ; 24 cm
系列 Cambridge studies in European law and policy
Cambridge studies in European law and policy
附註 "The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ"-- Provided by publisher
"This book seeks to offer a critical perspective on the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In particular, it focuses on the question of the limits of legal reasoning: how far creativity and freedom from constraint can go in the task of legal reasoning by the EU judiciary. This question has two aspects to it: the epistemic or descriptive possibility of conserving versus creative interpretation and the normative desirability of conserving versus creative interpretation. The argument of the book is that interpretation by the judiciary linked to the understanding or interpretation of the law-maker is both epistemically possible and normatively desirable. This conserving (or orginalist or historical) approach to interpretation coheres much better with the rule of law and democracy, the twin pillars of accepted political morality in Europe, than the relatively creative, teleological approach to interpretation that is widely recognised to be the hallmark of the ECJ"-- Provided by publisher
Includes bibliographical references and index
Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction and overview: interpretation and the European Court of Justice; 2. Reading the Court of Justice; 3. Reconceptualising the legal reasoning of the Court of Justice: interpretation and its constraints; 4. Retrieving a separation of powers in the EU; 5. EU law and a hierarchy of interpretative techniques; 6. Levels of generality and originalist interpretation in EU law; 7. Subjective originalist interpretation in EU law; 8. Conclusion
主題 Court of Justice of the European Communities
Judicial process -- European Union countries
Law -- European Union countries -- Interpretation and construction
Law -- European Union countries -- Methodology
Record:   Prev Next