Record:   Prev Next
Author Weldon-Johns, Michelle, author
Title Assisted reproduction, discrimination, and the law / Dr. Michelle Weldon-Johns
Imprint Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, 2020
book jacket
 人文社會聯圖  KD3103.W6 W45 2020    DUE 10-25-21    30660020226135
Descript ix, 135 pages ; 23 cm
text txt rdacontent
unmediated n rdamedia
volume nc rdacarrier
Note "Routledge Focus"
Includes bibliographical references and index
Introduction -- Current conceptions of equality and the limitations for those involved in assisted reproduction -- Conceiving a more social model of disability : infertility as disability -- Conceiving a new interpretation of pregnancy and sex discrimination : redefining the boundaries -- A right to time off work to undergo ART treatments -- Conclusions
"The numbers of women undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) treatments have risen steadily, yet they remain largely outside the scope of equality and employment law protection while undergoing treatment. Assisted Reproduction, Discrimination and the Law examines this gap in UK law, with reference to EU law as appropriate, and argues that new conceptions of equality are necessary. Drawing from the literature on multidimensional and intersectional discrimination, it is argued that an intersectionality approach offers a more useful analytical framework to extend protection to those engaged in ART treatments. Drawing from Schiek's intersectional nodes model, the book critically examines two alternative interpretations of existing protected characteristics, namely: infertility as a disability, with reference to the social model of disability and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2006; and redefining the boundaries of pregnancy and/or sex discrimination, with reference to attempts to extend associative discrimination to pregnancy. Comparisons are drawn with the US, where infertility has been recognised as a disability under the American's with Disabilities Act 1990 and as a pregnancy-related condition under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1978. A specific right to paid time off work to undergo treatment is also proposed, drawing comparisons with the US Family and Medical Leave Act 1993 and the existing UK work-family rights framework. It is argued that the reinterpretations of equality law and the rights proposed here are not only conceptually possible, but could practically be achieved with minor, but significant, amendments to existing legislation"-- Provided by publisher
Subject Pregnant women -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain
Human reproductive technology -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain
Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain
Record:   Prev Next