| 說明 |
263-285面 ; 30公分 |
| 附註 |
中國文化研究所學報. 新第6期. 抽印本 |
|
英文題名: The dual crises of modern Chinese historiography: Remarks on the birth of the "new history" and its predicament |
|
Summary: Among today's social sciences, history is the only branch indigenous to traditional Chinese learning; thus, using it as a focus to observe how a traditional learning responded to the impact of Western culture is particularly significant. Liang Qichao(1873-1929) is commonly regarded as the pioneer of the "new history". Therefore, his transiton to Western historiography aptly serves as the point of departure for an analysis of the transformation of modern Chinese historiography. Other leading historians in the early Republican Era will also be discussed whenever conducive to strengthening my argument, namely: the birth of the so-called "new history" did not overcome the dual crises that had caused its transformation; on the contrary, it accelerated the disintegration of Chinese historiography as a whole. |
| 主題 |
史學 -- 中國
csht
|
| Alt Title |
The dual crises of modern Chinese historiography: Remarks on the birth of the "new history" and its predicament |
|
試論「新史學」的誕生及其所面臨的困境 |
|
