Record:   Prev Next
作者 邱澎生 (1963-) 著
書名 「數目字管理」是洞見或是限制? : 黃仁宇「大歷史觀」 下的明清市場與政府 / 邱澎生著
出版項 臺北市 : 國立臺灣大學歷史學系, 民89[2000]
館藏地 索書號 處理狀態 OPAC 訊息 條碼
 傅斯年圖書館紀念室  R Chiu-P-S  2000C    館內使用  撤架區  30530104370820
說明 [26]面 ; 25公分
附註 臺大歷史學報. 第26期. 抽印本
提要: 本文檢討黃仁宇所提「數字管理」概念,文分兩節,第一節針對,「數目字管理」概念的三大構成要素;經濟組織、法律體系、文化觀念,說明黃氏如何藉此分析明清中國「不能在數目字管理」而十七世紀末英國則「能夠在數目字上管理」。第二節透過學界對明清市場與政府關係的新理解,反省「數目字管理」概念的作用與限制。基本上,我同意黃氏所提「經濟組織、法律體系、文化觀念」三者對分析明清市場與政府關係演變的洞見,但是,黃氏未能細緻說明三者間的交付關連;更因為預設「現代性」發展的普同方向,從也減弱了三者間可能存在的複雜互動。如何發展黃氏開創的業績?是值得繼續努力的學術事業。
含徵引書目
Abstract: My review article analyses and evalutes the "mathematically manageable" thesis raised by Professor Ray Huang. He points out three components in this thesis: form of effcient economic organizations, innovation of effective judicial sysytem, and cultural constructions of private property. Only in England by the end of 17 century,have these components have all met together, though it is more like a process in conjunction than sa series of conscious movement. By contrast, as Huang asserts, economic and human resources cannot be divided into interchangeable pieces in China, that is why he called it the "mathematically unmanageble"{272b67}state. After sketching out the above thesis, I testify some of the shortcomings when applies it to China. In conclusion,I posit two facets about Professor Huang's thesis. One is that the economic-legal-cultural components are indeed potential factors when delving into market/government relations in Late Imperial China, albeit they still needed to be defined carefully. The other is the theoretic deficiency,as it presumes all "modern{272b67}countries converge in capitalism,ignoring the possibility of the "alternative modernity"{272b67}entailed in the economic organizations,legal system,and cultural understandings and interrelation of Late Imperial China.
主題 明清
現代性
資本主義
市場
數目字管理
mathematically manageable
market
apitalism
modernity
Late Imperical China
Alt Title 數目字管理是洞見或是限制
黃仁宇大歷史觀下的明清市場與政府
黃仁宇「大歷史觀」 下的明清市場與政府
Record:   Prev Next